Modern Infectious Diseases: Macroeconomic Impacts and Policy Responses

August 2020

David E. Bloom (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health), Michael Kuhn (Wittgenstein Centre, Vienna Institute of Demogrpahy), Klaus Prettner (Vienna University of Economics and Business)

IIEP working paper 2020-17

Abstract: *This paper is part of a Symposium organized by Dr. Remi Jedwab of the George Washington University that will appear in the Journal of Economic Literature.* We discuss and review literature on the macroeconomic effects of epidemics and pandemics since the late 20th century. First, we cover the role of health in driving economic growth and well-being and discuss standard frameworks for assessing the economic burden of infectious diseases. Second, we sketch a general theoretical framework to evaluate the tradeoffs policymakers must consider when addressing infectious diseases and their macroeconomic repercussions. In so doing, we emphasize the dependence of economic consequences on (i) disease characteristics; (ii) inequalities among individuals in terms of susceptibility, preferences, and income; and (iii) cross-country heterogeneities in terms of their institutional and macroeconomic environments. Third, we study pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical policies aimed at mitigating and preventing infectious diseases and their macroeconomic repercussions. Fourth, we discuss the health toll and economic impacts of five infectious diseases: HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, influenza, and COVID-19. Although major epidemics and pandemics can take an enormous human toll and impose a staggering economic burden, early and targeted health and economic policy interventions can often mitigate both to a substantial degree.

 

JEL Codes: D15, D58, E10, E20, I12, I15, I18, I31, O40

Key Words: Pandemics; Epidemics; COVID-19; HIV/AIDS; Malaria; Tuberculosis; Influenza; Infectious Disease; Economic Burden of Disease; Economic Growth; Economic Epidemiology; SIR Model; General Equilibrium Macroeconomic Models; Health; Inequality; Welfare; Human Capital; Health Policy;

GW is committed to digital accessibility. If you experience a barrier that affects your ability to access content on this page, let us know via the Accessibility Feedback Form.